• Login
    View Item 
    •   UBIR Home
    • School of Law
    • Law Faculty Publications (public)
    • View Item
    •   UBIR Home
    • School of Law
    • Law Faculty Publications (public)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Litigation Discovery and Corporate Governance: The Missing Story About the 'Genius of American Corporate Law'

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Halberstam_Litigation Discovery and Corporate Governance.pdf (740.9Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Halberstam, Michael
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Strikingly absent from the entire corporate governance and corporate litigation debate is a unique feature of American civil procedure that deserves special attention: the modern civil discovery regime. This Article attempts to fill this gap. We argue that modern discovery — first established by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938 — has had a profound impact on the evolution of shareholder litigation, corporate governance, and the culture of corporate disclosure in the United States. This Article shows that (1) litigation discovery, and its threat, have driven and structured the process of corporate shareholder litigation; (2) the information generated by discovery has stimulated the development of case law defining shareholder rights and managerial duties; (3) the episodic legal demands for detailed corporate internal information (and the threat of discovery) have induced incremental improvements in corporate governance practices, including more exacting decision procedures, internal monitoring, recordkeeping, and disclosure; (4) highly developed, continuously evolving discovery practices have established templates for independent corporate internal investigations by boards and regulators; and (5) discovery has given regulators steady insight into changing corporate internal practices and patterns of wrongdoing to which regulators have responded with broad legal and regulatory changes. This Article concludes that litigation discovery serves, inter alia, as a form of ex post disclosure, which complements and enforces ex ante disclosure under the federal securities laws. These observations have important normative implications for legal transplants and the enforcement debate. Among other things, this Article cautions against legal transplants of U.S.-style securities disclosure, aggregate litigation mechanisms, and other enforcement mechanisms without considering appropriate tools for investigating corporate internal wrongdoing ex post, and points to problems in the empirical literature on U.S. shareholder litigation outcomes. It also questions current proposed reforms to the federal discovery rules.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10477/34257
    Collections
    • Law Faculty Publications (public)

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Landmark on Main Street (Folder 1) 

      Landmark on Main Street Housing Development Fund Corporation (New York, N.Y. : Bruner Foundation, Inc., 2001)
    • Boundary Avenue Project -- Loretta Claiborne Medical Arts Building 

      Crispus Attucks Community Development Corporation (New York, N.Y. : Bruner Foundation, Inc., 2001)
    • Landmark on Main Street (Folder 2) 

      Landmark on Main Street Housing Development Fund Corporation (New York, N.Y. : Bruner Foundation, Inc., 2001)

    To add content to the repository or for technical support: Contact Us
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBIRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    To add content to the repository or for technical support: Contact Us