Observation, explanation, and intuition: Two arguments against moral realism
MetadataShow full item record
The purpose of this dissertation is to establish the faulty of moral realism. Moral realism is here understood as comprising of two metaphysical claims: Namely, (1) that moral values exist as a property of human actions and characters and social institutions and (2) that they exist objectively, i.e., exist independently of our beliefs and knowledge and social conventions. In the dissertation two of the major criticisms that have been hurled against moral realism (namely, an Argument from Explanation and an Argument from Intractability of Moral Opinions) as well as moral realists' various responses to these criticisms will be examined. It will be concluded that none of these realists' responses are successful, and therefore, moral realism cannot be defended.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Cline, Brendan Matthew (2017)This dissertation is a collection of essays that work together to defend normative skepticism. Normative skepticism, as I will discuss it, can be understood as the disjunction of normative error theory and epistemological ...
"Balancing Your Strengths Against Your Felonies": Considerations for Military Recruitment of Ex-Offenders Boucai, Michael (University of Miami Law Review, 2007)
From Nuremberg to Buffalo, October 4, 1946: Justice Robert H. Jackson’s enduring lessons of morality and law in a world at war UB Law Library (2012-07-16)The 2011 Mitchell Lecture revisits a major address at UB’s Centennial by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, delivered immediately after Justice Jackson returned from serving as the Chief U.S. prosecutor at the ...